On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > BN> I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we > BN> started to actually *have* release criteria to test against. We > BN> didn't slip nearly as much when we weren't testing it. > > To me this implies that we should begin testing earlier (or, perhaps, > never stop testing) and treat any new failure as an event of > significance. It's tough to meet a six month cycle if we spend half of > it telling people to expect everything to be broken. > Possibly also stop changing earlier? It's hard to test a moving target. Would an 8[1] month cycle cause fewer slips per release? Fewer bugs? -Mike [1] Just picked some number slightly longer then the current cycle for purposes of discussion, not suggesting it. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
