On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 13:29 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > BN> I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we > BN> started to actually *have* release criteria to test against. We > BN> didn't slip nearly as much when we weren't testing it. > > To me this implies that we should begin testing earlier (or, perhaps, > never stop testing) and treat any new failure as an event of > significance. It's tough to meet a six month cycle if we spend half of > it telling people to expect everything to be broken. We don't really have the personpower for this at present. Doing validation testing of four or five composes per release is already a large amount of effort; we really don't have the people currently to run the validation test suite every day. When more of it is automated we may be able to do something like this. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel