Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> To me this implies that we should begin testing earlier (or, perhaps,
> never stop testing) and treat any new failure as an event of
> significance. It's tough to meet a six month cycle if we spend half of
> it telling people to expect everything to be broken.
We HAVE to accept that Rawhide is sometimes broken to be able to do active
development. If we need Rawhide to be always 100% regression-free, we will
never get anywhere. It's Rawhide for a reason.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
