On Mon, 02.08.10 17:01, Mike Prispan (fr.prop@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hi all, > > maybe I'm wrong (I guess I am), but is PulseAudio really dead? What lead me > to this conclusion? Well look at this: > * Fedora has 201 NEW/ASSIGNED bugs right now [1] > * there was not fixed a single bug last six months (since 2010-02-23) [2][3] > * there are not only "not pulseaudio, but alsa is broken" bugs, for example > abrt reported crashes > > No development, no bug fixing, hard to say if there are any comments from > bug assignee(s) at all. I've checked only a few bug and did not find any, > only from bug reporters pinging or asking if more info is required, but I > did not check it using bugzilla query (don't know if it's possible at all). > > So, again, is PulseAudio dead? Seems to me No, it's not. I am just pushing systemd through right now, and did other stuff. Also, check upstream git to figure out whether a project is dead. The last commit there is from 2 weeks ago. Git can tell you something about whether development happens. Bugzilla just tells you whether I have devoted my life to processing bug reports. And well, I haven't done that. Sorry that I don't exclsuively spend my time on making my stats on bugzilla look pretty. If I did, then I would not get any real work done anymore. Most of the abrt stuff can probably be merged as duplicates. I'd welcome if somebody wants to go through this and do this. BTW, would be cool to direct flamewar-inducing mails like this to me directly, first. Unless of course you think flamewars are a good thing, not a bad thing. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
