Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 02.08.10 17:01, Mike Prispan (fr.prop@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> maybe I'm wrong (I guess I am), but is PulseAudio really dead? What lead >> me to this conclusion? Well look at this: >> * Fedora has 201 NEW/ASSIGNED bugs right now [1] >> * there was not fixed a single bug last six months (since 2010-02-23) >> [2][3] * there are not only "not pulseaudio, but alsa is broken" bugs, >> for example abrt reported crashes >> >> No development, no bug fixing, hard to say if there are any comments from >> bug assignee(s) at all. I've checked only a few bug and did not find any, >> only from bug reporters pinging or asking if more info is required, but I >> did not check it using bugzilla query (don't know if it's possible at >> all). >> >> So, again, is PulseAudio dead? Seems to me > > No, it's not. I am just pushing systemd through right now, and did other > stuff. > > Also, check upstream git to figure out whether a project is dead. The > last commit there is from 2 weeks ago. Git can tell you something about > whether development happens. Bugzilla just tells you whether I have > devoted my life to processing bug reports. And well, I haven't done > that. Sorry that I don't exclsuively spend my time on making my stats on > bugzilla look pretty. If I did, then I would not get any real work done > anymore. > > Most of the abrt stuff can probably be merged as duplicates. I'd welcome > if somebody wants to go through this and do this. > > BTW, would be cool to direct flamewar-inducing mails like this to me > directly, first. Unless of course you think flamewars are a good thing, > not a bad thing. > > Lennart > Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so you can get "real work" done. /s Let me know if you need some help to make the stats looks pretty. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
