On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:58 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 07/28/2010 04:47 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:16 PM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:drago01@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > No disagreement here ... in fact this is a not really a "baby step" > > but "have something usable and start from there" which makes a lot of > > sense. > > > > > > As much as I want Chromium to be in Fedora, I don't want it in the > > repository if it is going to have crippled HTML5 support. > > To be fair, Chromium uses ffmpeg for its HTML5. If you have ffmpeg > installed (with my Chromium builds), then you get HTML5 support. If you > don't, well, you don't. Chromium isn't "crippled". Fedora just can't > include ffmpeg for obvious reasons, and Chromium has chosen not to use > the native libv8 code. > Speaking of which, is there any chance to split ffmpeg into free (which could be included in fedora) and nonfree part? IIRC we've done something like that with xine-lib-extras and gst-plugins-bad in the past... Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
