On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote: > On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote: > > In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is > > for a distribution that's "lost their way". We can still be a leading > > distribution and not include pre-release software. Especially pre-release > > software that's not only in our critical path, but also something that > > almost all of us use every day. > I agree, but doesn't that mean that Firefox 4.0 won't be available in > F14 at all and will only be in F15? > I think it would be a huge drawback for Fedora 14. It would be huge if there people who can't live without it didn't have any other way of getting it than having it pre-packaged. I think Firefox 4 looks to be fantastic, but the truth is that people only have to wait a few months for a release with it pre-packaged, if they're not able to add it on their own. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
