2010/7/27 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> >>> [xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 >>> xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 >> >> I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what >> the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a mess of >> licenses - I count 25 files or symbolic links called COPYING or LICENSE in >> the unpacked source and the base level COPYING file talks about license >> conditions at the head of some files. They all seem to be basically GPL, >> LGPL or BSD with one case of The "Artistic License". >> Should I include all the COPYING or LICENSE files, one of each type of >> license (though some of the license files have different md5sums even when >> they claim to be the same license) or just the bottom level COPYING file? > > You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry. > > ~spot > -- If a GPL binary is compiled with mixed BSD and GPL source files, should we also add the BSD license text along with GPL text? Regards, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
