Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:

> [xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64
> xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64

I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what 
the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a mess of 
licenses - I count 25 files or symbolic links called COPYING or LICENSE in 
the unpacked source and the base level COPYING file talks about license 
conditions at the head of some files. They all seem to be basically GPL, 
LGPL or BSD with one case of The "Artistic License".
Should I include all the COPYING or LICENSE files, one of each type of 
license (though some of the license files have different md5sums even when 
they claim to be the same license) or just the bottom level COPYING file?

 	Michael Young
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux