On 07/19/2010 05:42 PM, M A Young wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >> [xen-maint] xen: xen-doc-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 >> xen-libs-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 xen-hypervisor-4.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 > > I am a co-maintainer of the xen package, and I am trying to work out what > the best way to comply with these changes since xen is rather a mess of > licenses - I count 25 files or symbolic links called COPYING or LICENSE in > the unpacked source and the base level COPYING file talks about license > conditions at the head of some files. They all seem to be basically GPL, > LGPL or BSD with one case of The "Artistic License". > Should I include all the COPYING or LICENSE files, one of each type of > license (though some of the license files have different md5sums even when > they claim to be the same license) or just the bottom level COPYING file? You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry. ~spot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
