Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 22.07.10 21:30, Horst H. von Brand (vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 22.07.10 15:19, Simo Sorce (ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > [...] > > Sorry, but what if the configuration got screwed up, and <whatever daemon> > > just won't start properly? Was replaced by a broken version which crashes > > on startup? Or gets into a loop (or just does something very timeconsuming > > sometimes) before being ready to answer? This _needs_ answers. > > Well, if a service might take an hour to start up it is not a good > candidate for socket activation. Sure isn't. The problem is how to handle a service that usually starts in a tenth of a second for some reason today takes forever. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
