Re: concept of package "ownership"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/03/2010 03:49 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
>> In the old days of RHL and beehive, I think we had it about right...
>> with the obvious exception that it was Red Hat only, but the attitude to
>> packaging was right, IMHO. There _was_ someone who knew most about a
>> package and was expected to deal with it most of the time, but it was
>> also perfectly reasonable for other people to work on the packages too.
>>
>> Fedora seems to have regressed a lot in that respect, although it did
>> improve after we started approving ProvenPackagers.
>
> But the official provenpackager policy is way too restrictive on allowed
> changes, so I'm often left wondering "Will I get away with doing that
> change?"

Yep.

On such occasions, I usually resort to being "ultra conservative", i.e. 
to only apply changes when I am sure about them.

> and several times, I have to err on the side of caution, wasting
> both my and the maintainer's time by filing bugs etc. when I could just fix
> the issue.
So do I.

Ralf
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux