I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to and are trying to help continue to grow. The package "owner" gets emails about cvs commits, so they are always aware of what's going on and can review the changes to packages they maintain. In the event of a discrepancy then the person receiving the email obviously has an email account and can easily email the person who made the edit in order to extend a friendly inquiry as to the change. It doesn't need to be any more complicated than that. I for one welcome co-maintainers because I'm a big fan of collaboration and a sense of community, and if I can't trust my fellow community member and contributor to help in the maintenance of packages that I just so happen to have a bit flipped for in the pkgdb, then I'm in the wrong place. -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
