On 07/02/2010 06:43 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/2/10 9:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> I had to apply and justify the reasons why I wanted to be a >>>> provenpackager. >> I know you did, but the Petr's did not. Their presumable supervisor @RH >> (Marcella) rushed them through the process and they had been granted >> access to several 100 package. > > The Petrs were not applying for provenpackager. True. They actually wanted "perl-sig" access, which current is technically impossible, because the Fedora's packager infrastructure doesn't support "groups". Instead they had applied for "full access" to all "perl-related packages" and had been granted it. > Being @RH had absolutely no play in this. As I already said, my view differs. >>>> I really don't think there is any kind on conspiracy doing on, honestly. >> I am not talking about conspiracy, I am talking about double standards. >> >> What would do if "John Doe" would apply for proven packager and write >> access to 1500 packages? >> >> Seriously, you'd likely tell him he's nuts. > > Bad analogy. Correct, I was incorrect in using the provenpackager, here. Scratch it, the rest of the anology still applies. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
