-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/2/10 9:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> I had to apply and justify the reasons why I wanted to be a >> > provenpackager. > I know you did, but the Petr's did not. Their presumable supervisor @RH > (Marcella) rushed them through the process and they had been granted > access to several 100 package. The Petrs were not applying for provenpackager. They had what was assumed to be a sig's blessing to be granted write access to a set of packages. Not the entire world. We at that point had no policy that would stop this, regardless of who requested and who was the people being added. Being @RH had absolutely no play in this. > >> > I really don't think there is any kind on conspiracy doing on, honestly. > I am not talking about conspiracy, I am talking about double standards. > > What would do if "John Doe" would apply for proven packager and write > access to 1500 packages? > > Seriously, you'd likely tell him he's nuts. Bad analogy. There was no provenpackager access granted. Toshio didn't blindly accept the request, he called out to what he thought was the correct governing body over those packages and did not receive any negative feedback, after a week. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwuFzkACgkQ4v2HLvE71NV9twCgxmDU7xDtsjDfUxCWuvPJ51Rd q3UAnjPrmeyTbHpNxxP51u6bbUAyzT7U =edXM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
