Re: concept of package "ownership"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> We need groups, with "grouped privileges/acls" etc. It's essentially
> what e.g. the "perl-sig" originally was meant to be.

Yes, group ACLs are definitely needed, but in addition to that technical 
feature, we also need to make sure that the SIG actually gets commit access 
to ALL packages related to the SIG. ALL perl-* packages should be 
committable to by the Perl SIG. That's what a SIG is for. And it'd have 
prevented this whole "why were X and Y added as maintainers to my perl-* 
packages" fiasco, it would just have been the SIG's decision to add the 
people to the SIG and this should automatically give commit access to all 
perl-* packages.

Similarly, all packages using Qt should be committable to by the KDE SIG 
etc.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux