-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/1/10 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, that'd also > make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a problem. You see a > problem, you fix it. Who cares whether the package has an active maintainer > or not? While I agree that package "ownership" should not feel possessive, I do strongly feel that there still should be some single person (or team I suppose...) who is ultimately responsible for the package. A place for bug reports, for autoqa activity, for reviewing potential patches and changes from other people, etc... - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwtaF8ACgkQ4v2HLvE71NXCCwCgxoNtzgQ/DDpx78uI4jjodHSu GTYAnAxN9OwDW/qnXMDnZKfp4zCNG8NO =F1ef -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
