Re: concept of package "ownership"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:36:34PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> 
> I think escalating to FESCo is only suitable for changes which are
> controversial between different people, we should have another policy
> to treat those non-responsive issues, maintainers should respond on
> bugzilla report in time.

I agree with you, and that's why I proposed a policy with Rahul.
This may certainly be enhanced. If I recall well this was 
rejected.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance

I am no more involved in Fedora (except for unfrequent whining on the
devel list) so I won't be able to follow on this issue, but I still
agree that it is a problematic issue. Until such a policy is available,
however, ther is no other possibility than escalation to FESCo.

-- 
Pat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux