Re: concept of package "ownership"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:44:29 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yeah.  There needs to be somebody in the Fedora community with a
> long-term commitment to each package.  Perhaps the term "owner" is
> politically incorrect but nonetheless there is always going to be
> somebody who knows more about that package than anybody else in
> Fedora. 

Sure. But they should also welcome others joining them, not say "I own
this package, its mine all mine!", IMHO. 

> I think it's counterproductive to downgrade that
> responsibility, or even worse pretend that it doesn't matter --- and
> Kevin's lead statement in this thread is damn close to pretending
> that.  Sorry Kevin, we are not interchangeable parts.

Which Kevin? I never intended to say any such thing... :)

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux