On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:59 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:46:51AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:41 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > And I doubt that python scripts in below > > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages usually need to be executable. Since > > > yum works without any problems, these tons of errors are useless, too. > > > And they make it only harder to find real errors. I did not think more > > > about the other quoted rpmlint messages. > > > > > > > > > > It's complaining because the files have #! in them, likely to assist in > > self tests, but the files aren't marked as executable. That could > > actually be fixed upstream, either mark them as executable or remove the > > #!s. > > I understand the rpmlint test, but I do not understand why this needs to > be handled upstream or why this is any problem at all. Are there > packages with executable files in the python-sitelib that need to be > executable or are used by users of the installed package as executables? > *shrug* I suppose it's worth checking with upstream over it. And discussing whether that rpmlint rule should be removed in our build. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
