Re: Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:25:01PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> > yum.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/yum.bash
> > yum.noarch: E: non-executable-script 
> > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/repos.py 0644L /usr/bin/python

> Which of those messages do you consider noise and why?  Most of them
> look valid to me, though they are indeed nits.

Bash completion files are imho either always or never config files. So
it is either an error that needs to be fixed or not worth a warning.

And I doubt that python scripts in below
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages usually need to be executable. Since
yum works without any problems, these tons of errors are useless, too.
And they make it only harder to find real errors. I did not think more
about the other quoted rpmlint messages.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpih8thM4n5z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux