On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Well, then lets begin: > > # rpmlint yum > yum.noarch: W: self-obsoletion yum-allow-downgrade < 1.1.20-0 obsoletes > yum-allow-downgrade [...] > yum.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/yum.bash > yum.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/repos.py 0644L /usr/bin/python [...] > Or ... > # rpmlint binutils > binutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US addr -> add, > adder, adds > binutils.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit > /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13.so exit@xxxxxxxxxxx > binutils.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit > /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13.so _exit@xxxxxxxxxxx > binutils.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libopcodes-2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13.so /lib64/libz.so.1 > binutils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ld.bfd > binutils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ld.gold > binutils.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Which of those messages do you consider noise and why? Most of them look valid to me, though they are indeed nits. -- Matt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
