On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 13:25 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Well, then lets begin: > > > > # rpmlint yum > > yum.noarch: W: self-obsoletion yum-allow-downgrade < 1.1.20-0 obsoletes > > yum-allow-downgrade [...] > Which of those messages do you consider noise and why? Most of them > look valid to me, though they are indeed nits. The self obsolete ones are wrong, being able to do: Name: foo Provide: bar = 2 Obsolete: bar <= 2 ...is completely legal and needed for rename/merging which is why yum has them. -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.28 http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
