Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/6/3 Matt McCutchen <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 20:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Chen Lei wrote:
>> > Is it right for the maintainer to provide  two separate subpackages,
>> > one with the tranditional rc.d contents and one with an upstart
>> > scripts and make the -upstart subpackage have a higher priority over
>> > sysinit subpackage?
>>
>> No. This is against our packaging guidelines.
>
> Where do you see that?
>
> --
> Matt
>
I'm not sure about whether ship upstart scripts violate our
guidelines, but fedora package guideline has - "Currently, only
SystemV-style initscripts are supported in Fedora".
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Initscripts


Chen Lei
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux