On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:30:23AM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/6/3 Matt McCutchen <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 20:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Chen Lei wrote: > >> > Is it right for the maintainer to provide two separate subpackages, > >> > one with the tranditional rc.d contents and one with an upstart > >> > scripts and make the -upstart subpackage have a higher priority over > >> > sysinit subpackage? > >> > >> No. This is against our packaging guidelines. > > > > Where do you see that? > > > > -- > > Matt > > > I'm not sure about whether ship upstart scripts violate our > guidelines, but fedora package guideline has - "Currently, only > SystemV-style initscripts are supported in Fedora". > hshiottp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Initscripts > This is intended to tell people that SystemVinit scripts are mandatory for services managed by the init system. But providing native upstart as an addition (or initng, minit, etc) is not prohibited by this. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpZJ4IrXNakb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
