2010/6/1 Ryan Rix <ry@xxxxxxxx>: > On Mon 31 May 2010 1:55:26 pm Paul Wouters wrote: >> since that's the preference >> of the maintainer, which violates fedora packagaging policies > > Then a provenpackager should fix it regardless of whether the maintainer "is > too busy to fix it." and even then, they shouldn't be maintaining packages > they are too busy to fix! That's just as bad as blatently refusing to fix > this issue. > > -- > Ryan Rix > == http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ == > == http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word == > The maintainer refuse some others to co-maintain tor package or help him to solve this issue. It's a bit complicated to fix this, fedora policy seems don't permit provenpackagers to commit a package if the maintainer are very unwilling to do so. It should be decided by fesco in which condition that a provenpackager can commit a package regardless the unwillingness of the package owner. Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
