On Mon 31 May 2010 1:55:26 pm Paul Wouters wrote: > since that's the preference > of the maintainer, which violates fedora packagaging policies Then a provenpackager should fix it regardless of whether the maintainer "is too busy to fix it." and even then, they shouldn't be maintaining packages they are too busy to fix! That's just as bad as blatently refusing to fix this issue. -- Ryan Rix == http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ == == http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word ==
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel