On Sat 29 May 2010 11:10:35 pm Matthew Miller wrote: > And this one is: packages should not print out messages complaining about > the state of other packages in Fedora. That's not the right process for > solving those issues. If redhat-lsb is broken, there's a procedure for > dealing with that, and it isn't "give confusing warnings to the end > users!" +1 Airing out our dirty laundry for our users to see is not something that we should allow or promote. I'm all for reporting errors, but b*tching to users? No. I'm going to file a bug on this if someone else has not. It's pretty non-excellent of this package's maintainer, but judging by his previous actions I am not surprised. He has shown in the past that he has no qualms with breaking the "be excellent to eachother" rule. Ryan -- Ryan Rix == http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ == == http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word ==
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
