On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:17:11AM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:59:08AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:06:52AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > > > Unless RHEL 6 is needed to get sufficient VM capability, as was said > > > above would it not be cleaner to compile the entire release in a VM > > > using fedora itself? > > > > Last I heard, the builders were going to be changed to use a VM to > > fully encapsulate the build. Don't know what the timelines were on > > this. There was some talk of using libguestfs to upload and/or > > download files into the VMs which is why I heard about this. > > > I haven't heard this and it might be a misinterpretation of other things. > > skvidal and I are working on a builder for third party add on repositories > for Fedora. That builder would be separate from koji and would, indeed use > a vm for building. You might want to talk to mbonnet if there's plans on > adding vm capability to koji. (I don't think there is as that was one of > the reasons we decided we should be creating a different build system). Fair enough, I was confused then. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
