Re: base kernel to build fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:35:37AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 04:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> > The problem with using a VM created using the latest unstable Fedora
> > is that the latest unstable Fedora might not be working.  Perhaps we
> > could always build Fedora n+1 on top of Fedora n.
> > 
> > Rich.
> > 
> 
>   What some do is keep several build trees - at least 2 - (say B0, B1,
> B2 ) - let current rawhide be B2.
> 
>  use B2 to build B3 - if it succeeds then move current rawhide to B3
> otherwise it remains at B2.

Just because you manage to build a kernel, or even manage to boot a
kernel, doesn't mean it really works.  We really need all the testing
that goes into a full Fedora release before we trust what is built
from that, which is why my suggestion of building Fedora N+1 on Fedora N.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux