Re: base kernel to build fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:06:52AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>   Unless RHEL 6 is needed to get sufficient VM capability, as was said
> above would it not be cleaner to compile the entire release in a VM
> using fedora itself?

Last I heard, the builders were going to be changed to use a VM to
fully encapsulate the build.  Don't know what the timelines were on
this.  There was some talk of using libguestfs to upload and/or
download files into the VMs which is why I heard about this.

The problem with using a VM created using the latest unstable Fedora
is that the latest unstable Fedora might not be working.  Perhaps we
could always build Fedora n+1 on top of Fedora n.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux