On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:59:08AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:06:52AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > > Unless RHEL 6 is needed to get sufficient VM capability, as was said > > above would it not be cleaner to compile the entire release in a VM > > using fedora itself? > > Last I heard, the builders were going to be changed to use a VM to > fully encapsulate the build. Don't know what the timelines were on > this. There was some talk of using libguestfs to upload and/or > download files into the VMs which is why I heard about this. > I haven't heard this and it might be a misinterpretation of other things. skvidal and I are working on a builder for third party add on repositories for Fedora. That builder would be separate from koji and would, indeed use a vm for building. You might want to talk to mbonnet if there's plans on adding vm capability to koji. (I don't think there is as that was one of the reasons we decided we should be creating a different build system). -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpMMSot6PNIR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
