On 05/13/2010 12:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:30:30AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages >>>>> (jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog >>>>> trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that >>>>> point on wiki. >>>>> >>>>> So: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Personally, I'd say. . .think really old is around three- >>>> >>>> >>>>> 1. Is is required to trim the changelog when renaming package? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Please don't, but do comment on the old name at the( relevant changelog >>>> entry. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Agreed -- I do trim changelogs of really old entries from my specs (4+ >>> years) once a year or so. That's separate from renaming. >>> >>> -Toshoi >>> >>> >> Agreed? I came out against trimming, not for. I don't feel terribly >> strongly about it, though. >> >> > Agreed as in: don't trim changelogs *because* you're renaming the package. > But also pointing out that trimming changelogs is reasonable as long as you > aren't treadingtoo closely to modern history. > > -Toshio > Gotcha. Yes, that's sane. -J -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
