On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:30:30AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > >> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages > >>> (jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog > >>> trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that > >>> point on wiki. > >>> > >>> So: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Personally, I'd say. . .think really old is around three- > >> > >>> 1. Is is required to trim the changelog when renaming package? > >>> > >>> > >> Please don't, but do comment on the old name at the( relevant changelog > >> entry. > >> > >> > > Agreed -- I do trim changelogs of really old entries from my specs (4+ > > years) once a year or so. That's separate from renaming. > > > > -Toshoi > > > Agreed? I came out against trimming, not for. I don't feel terribly > strongly about it, though. > Agreed as in: don't trim changelogs *because* you're renaming the package. But also pointing out that trimming changelogs is reasonable as long as you aren't treadingtoo closely to modern history. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpsnrz3syB51.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
