On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages >>> (jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog >>> trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that >>> point on wiki. >>> >>> So: >>> >>> >>> >> Personally, I'd say. . .think really old is around three- >> >>> 1. Is is required to trim the changelog when renaming package? >>> >>> >> Please don't, but do comment on the old name at the( relevant changelog >> entry. >> >> > Agreed -- I do trim changelogs of really old entries from my specs (4+ > years) once a year or so. That's separate from renaming. > > -Toshoi > Agreed? I came out against trimming, not for. I don't feel terribly strongly about it, though. -J -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
