Re: Renaming packages, trimming changelog and re-starting revisions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
> > (jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog
> > trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that
> > point on wiki.
> >
> > So:
> >
> >    
> Personally, I'd say. . .think really old is around three-
> > 1. Is is required to trim the changelog when renaming package?
> >    
> Please don't, but do comment on the old name at the( relevant changelog 
> entry.
>
Agreed -- I do trim changelogs of really old entries from my specs (4+
years) once a year or so.  That's separate from renaming.

-Toshoi

Attachment: pgpGCMiGYj3On.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux