On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 19:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > There are changes > which don't need testing, for example if a patch was dropped because we > thought it wasn't needed anymore, and it turns out the patch is still > needed, readding the patch needs no testing whatsoever because the patch has > ALREADY been tested, plus it's fixing a regression. This involved doing another build of the package, which could involve changes in the buildroot and anomalies in the build process. Ask DaveJ some time about what happened to his kernel builds when the build host did a clock adjustment during the build. Shit happens, and making assumptions that just because the build completed that nothing went wrong is a great way to make a fool of yourself. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
