On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 01:27 +0300, shmuel siegel wrote: > At the risk of putting words into Kevin's mouth, I think that you just > made his point. I'd be very surprised if Kevin couldn't get x number of > people to say yes to a fix that he considered urgent. This might confirm > that the fix had its expected consequence, but I think that he already > knew that or he wouldn't be trying to push it to stable. It wouldn't say > much for stability or edge cases, only a good regression suite would > give confidence on that score. The point here is that Kevin isn't perfect. As such, he can make mistakes, just like all of us. By asking for a couple karma nods from different people, we increase the chance of catching some of those mistakes. Since the delay exists anyway, it doesn't seem to be that big of a deal to me to make sure a couple people test it and comment as such during that delay. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
