On 05/04/2010 01:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
You must all realize that the ratio of bureaucracy/process burden and
quality of maintainers/packagers go hand in hand. The better the
maintainers/packagers/components are less bureaucracy/process burden is
needed. The worse it gets more bureaucracy/process burden is needed. If
ye all feel that the bureaucracy/process burden is increasing that only
means that the quality of maintainers and their components is going
down.. ( we might be getting more components inn in less quality ).
If our maintainers suck, bureaucracy is not a good solution to fix that
problem.
But we already have a group of trusted maintainers, it's called
"provenpackager". We could give provenpackagers the power to push directly
to stable without any karma requirements.
Given the requirements FESCo + if they checks on the bugzilla activity
of the individual that wants to become a provenpackager and take that
into consideration when approving the request I dont see why not.
So basically it would be like this..
If you are a provenpackager you have the power to push directly to
stable without any karma requirements however if you are not a
provenpackager you will have to follow what ever procedure FESCo RELeng
and QA come up with at any given time until you have been accepted as a
provenpackager by FESCo.
Sounds like a draft to a solution everyone can agree with?
JBG
begin:vcard
fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson
n:Gudmundsson;Johann B.
org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management
adr:;;Sturlugata 8;Reykjavik;;101;Iceland
email;internet:johannbg@xxxxx
title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA
tel;work:+3545254267
tel;fax:+3545258801
url:www.rhi.hi.is
version:2.1
end:vcard
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
