On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 08:12 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 04:55, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Jeremy Katz and others wrote about the loss of > > kernel-source(code) > > > > I think the main problem is that a LOT of people use the current method > > well I agree that there are quite a few people who like to build their > own kernel config but based on our source tree. However the plan is to > include quite a bit of information for those people on how to get the > same result. It saves shipping 40Mb of redundant rpm and it saves quite > a bit of installation time though. > > > and expect it to be there for whatever arcane method. Just removing it > > without openly discussing it first smacks less of a community project > > we're having the discussion now right? after the fact. Not exactly likely to go back to the way it was, is it? -sv
