On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 04:55, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Jeremy Katz and others wrote about the loss of > kernel-source(code) > > I think the main problem is that a LOT of people use the current method well I agree that there are quite a few people who like to build their own kernel config but based on our source tree. However the plan is to include quite a bit of information for those people on how to get the same result. It saves shipping 40Mb of redundant rpm and it saves quite a bit of installation time though. > and expect it to be there for whatever arcane method. Just removing it > without openly discussing it first smacks less of a community project we're having the discussion now right?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
