On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 07:20:32AM -0400, Build System wrote: > kernel-2.6.7-1.448 > * Mon Jun 21 2004 Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx> > > - make kernel-doc and kernel-sourcecode builds independent of eachother > - disable kernel-sourcecode builds entirely, we'll be replacing it with documentation > on how to use the src.rpm instead for building your own kernel. We just recently had the discussion of how many documented processes will get broken with the kernel-source -> kernel-sourcecode change. Not having it at all doesn't really improve that. ;) What's the idea behind this? And what about people building external kernel modules? For the reasons outlined in the previous thread on this /lib/modules/`uname -r` is not adequate for that. Having the kernel-source package change its name is one thing we can adapt to (even though it was not necessary). Having it disappear for the face of earth is another :( Please, get it back! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpiHe51XeF3J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
