Le mar, 22/06/2004 Ã 09:37 -0400, Matthew Miller a Ãcrit : > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:47:53AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple > > > licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to > > > "GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't > > > chose to just GPL this.) > > usually I do something like "parts GPL parts IPL" or so > > Hmmm; maybe even "IPL (OpenAFS) and GPL (kernel headers)" or "IPL; kernel > build trees GPL". Or even better two different packages with clearly defined licenses (with the IPL part depending on the GPL one). Licencing spaguetti is real hard for users/admins to handle. Please do not mix multiple licenses in a single package - I hate to have to untangle such a mess manually. Dual licensing is different. One can just choose his preferred license and forget about the other one. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
