On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:25:38AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 01:21:37PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > there's a nitpick bug in the spec file: since your package includes a > > lot of files from the kernel copied verbatim, the License: tag should > > include GPL as well..... > > Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple > licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to > "GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't > chose to just GPL this.) usually I do something like "parts GPL parts IPL" or so
Attachment:
pgpw6V4kgyb5S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
