On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 06:26, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 18:12 -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > > Realistically we will not be able to remove gtk+ from the default > > install anytime soon because too many proprietary applications will > > depend on it for many years to come. However it is good to move > > applications to gtk2 whenever possible, because it makes i18n much less > > problematic. > > Actually, there are a couple of things here: > 1) The GNOME 1.x library stack. I think we're close to being able to > lose this and move it to a compat lib status, similar to compat-glibc, > etc. Mark it as deprecated and actually get rid of them within a > release or two. The amount of new software being released still using we should indeed more agressively start marking such libs compat-*, even if there's like one package in our distro still using it I guess. What we can do in a somewhat later phase is prevent development against these legacy libs somehow...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
