On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 01:21:37PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > there's a nitpick bug in the spec file: since your package includes a > lot of files from the kernel copied verbatim, the License: tag should > include GPL as well..... Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to "GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't chose to just GPL this.) > (and I guess your tarbals should include the COPYING file to be 100% > correct) Since it's not hard, no reason to be not 100%. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
