"GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't chose to just GPL this.)
Maybe LGPL would be better since OpenAFS works with several other open and closed Unix systems.
But GPL for the Linux kernel part would be great.
"GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't chose to just GPL this.)
But GPL for the Linux kernel part would be great.