On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:47:53AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple > > licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to > > "GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM didn't > > chose to just GPL this.) > usually I do something like "parts GPL parts IPL" or so Hmmm; maybe even "IPL (OpenAFS) and GPL (kernel headers)" or "IPL; kernel build trees GPL". -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
