On 03/13/2010 12:22 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 22:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> I think that new versions should, as a general rule, be pushed, unless there >> is a good reason NOT to push a particular new version (feature regressions, >> known unfixed new bugs as found during testing, requires manual >> intervention, breaks compatibility with existing user data etc.). (And of >> course, if there are such reasons, the update MUST NOT be pushed. That's >> what distinguishes the updates from Rawhide, and it's an important >> distinction, because it defines stability from the user's point of view.) > > Fundamental point of view difference. You take the point of view of > push everything all the time /unless/ there is a good enough reason not > to. > > Others take the point of view of not updating anything unless there is a > good enough reason /to/. Nicely put - There are two radical positions, which both lack "common sense" and both are impracticable. As usual, a pragmatical solution/compromise would be inbetween. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
