On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 22:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I think that new versions should, as a general rule, be pushed, unless there > is a good reason NOT to push a particular new version (feature regressions, > known unfixed new bugs as found during testing, requires manual > intervention, breaks compatibility with existing user data etc.). (And of > course, if there are such reasons, the update MUST NOT be pushed. That's > what distinguishes the updates from Rawhide, and it's an important > distinction, because it defines stability from the user's point of view.) Fundamental point of view difference. You take the point of view of push everything all the time /unless/ there is a good enough reason not to. Others take the point of view of not updating anything unless there is a good enough reason /to/. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
